skip to content

Conservation Research Institute


Collaboration between, and outside of, academic disciplines - how research should be!

orchid pic


New open access paper from multiple academic departments and conservation NGOs associated with the Cambridge Conservation Initiative including University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute and the Conservation Leadership programme based in the David Attenborough Building.



Conservation policy decisions can suffer from a lack of evidence, hindering effective decision‐making. In nature conservation, studies investigating why policy is often not evidence‐informed have tended to focus on Western democracies, with relatively small samples. To understand global variation and challenges better, we established a global survey aimed at identifying top barriers and solutions to the use of conservation science in policy. This obtained the views of 758 people in policy, practice, and research positions from 68 countries across six languages. Here we show that, contrary to popular belief, there is agreement about how to incorporate conservation science into policy, and there is thus room for optimism. Barriers related to the low priority of conservation were considered to be important, while mainstreaming conservation was proposed as a key solution. Therefore, priorities should include the elaboration of public policy pathways with education initiatives that promote the importance of long‐term conservation‐compatible policies.